22.2 C
New York
Monday, May 20, 2024

Buy now

spot_img

Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. v. Meta Platforms Inc. & Ors

[ad_1]

Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. v. Meta Platforms Inc. & Ors
In the Significant Court of Delhi
FAO 280/2023 and CM App. 56965/2023
Right before Justice Dharmesh Sharma
Made a decision on November 7, 2023

Relevancy of the situation: Making use of a registered trademark without authorisation for providing undergarments by means of on the net movies quantities to trademark infringement.

Statutes and Provisions Involved

  • The Data Technological know-how Act, 2000 (Part 2(w), 79)
  • The Code of Civil Method,1908 (Area 106, Get XLIII Rule 1, Get VII Rule 10)
  • The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (Area 2(c)(xvii))

Suitable Facts of the Case

  • The plaintiff/appellant manufactures and distributes a variety of healthcare goods employing its registered trademark ‘PATANJALI’.
  • Just one of the defendants/respondents posted a online video on internet platforms advertising men’s undergarments using the plaintiff’s trademark and photographs of its brand ambassadors without authorisation.
  • Other defendants/respondents, the net platforms (YouTube and Fb) are producing revenue from the stated video’s sights.

Well known Arguments by the Advocates

  • The counsel for the respondents argued that no proceedings can be brought versus them as they are simply intermediaries under Section 2(w) and are exempted from any legal responsibility less than Area 79 of the Info Technological innovation Act, 2000.

Impression of the Bench

  • The movie was manufactured to gain additional viewership of the channel/web url, however the plaintiff is not into production undergarments. The video utilized the plaintiff’s trademark, which quantities to infringement of the plaintiff’s rights below the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
  • YouTube and Fb have generated profits owing to the publication and steady viewership of the online video.
  • The present scenario is a trademark match, and it lies in the jurisdiction of industrial courts.

Closing Choice

  • The bench authorized the attraction and returned the plaint to the demo court docket.

Aditi Mangesh Sawant, an undergraduate university student at NMIMS Kirit P Mehta Faculty of Regulation, Mumbai, organized this scenario summary through her internship with The Cyber Website India in January/February 2024.

[ad_2]

Supply url

Related Articles

Stay Connected

0المشجعينمثل
3,912أتباعتابع
0المشتركينالاشتراك
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest Articles